The Online Games Debate
- Posted on
The Online Games Debate is a longstanding debate amongst game developers, researchers, and users. The arguments and disadvantages are discussed, future research is proposed, and problematic gameplay is assessed. The debate may be largely resolved with a combination of both arguments and evidence. However, many questions remain.
While both sides claim that they are concerned with the well-being of game players, their arguments diverge on what constitutes an acceptable amount of gaming time. Regardless of the reasons for the debate, the effects of gaming are hard to discern and the clashing data makes it difficult to decide what to do.
Online arguments can serve as a way to express identity, convince others, or prove a point. They can also be useful tools for socialization.
Online games are popular among young people because of their free nature, but there are disadvantages as well. These games can lead to poor eye sight and physical health, and they can disrupt human relationships. In addition, prolonged gaming sessions can contribute to obesity and social isolation. Hence, playing these games should be limited to a certain time frame and in moderation.
Online gaming can also be dangerous. It can encourage anti-social behavior and cyberbullying. Parents should monitor their children’s gaming time and ensure that they are not playing multiplayer games with strangers.
Future research in online games should focus on theories and frameworks that are relevant to the field, including constructivism, cognitivism, and sociocultural perspectives. Researchers should also pay attention to gender issues when analyzing games and should conduct comparative studies with various target groups. Moreover, mixed-method evaluations should be used to investigate different aspects of learning and gaming preferences.
To conduct an effective review, researchers should first gather relevant resources. These resources could be journal articles, conference papers, and systematic literature reviews. They should be published in English or French, and must adhere to the study objectives and definition of games as pedagogical applications. In addition, the articles should include both traditional and online games, idn poker as well as simulations.
Assessment of problematic gameplay
The current study evaluated the psychometric properties of the 12-item POGQ-SF, a self-report instrument for problematic gameplay in online games. The test was validated on a nationally representative sample of adolescent gamers. The results show that the instrument has appropriate psychometric properties and yields a high level of fit to data. However, future studies should further explore factors that contribute to problematic online gaming behavior, such as gamer characteristics and risk factors.
The POGQ-SF is a 12-item scale with acceptable psychometric properties, measuring six dimensions of problematic use. The twelve items were selected based on their high content validity and highest factor loadings. The questionnaire has the advantage of being short, simple, and flexible, which facilitates future research and helps legal authorities develop prevention programs.
Limits to acceptable gaming
Chinese regulators have recently imposed new age restrictions for children who play online games. The new limits are expected to drastically cut down on the amount of time that under-18s can spend gaming. However, the new rules are also likely to cut down on the number of players. According to recent research, more than half of all Chinese minors play online games on a weekly basis, and a quarter of them spend over two hours a day. The new rules were implemented after concerns from parents and teachers, and are meant to curb the over-use of online games.
While the prevalence of problematic gaming has risen, there is still no clear evidence to suggest that excessive gaming is responsible for the occurrence of serious health problems. Researchers and clinicians from various countries have studied problematic gaming. According to DSM-5 criteria, about 13.8% of adults are at risk for problematic gaming. Despite the prevalence of these problems, international efforts are needed to prevent the excessive use of gaming among vulnerable groups.